July 16, 2008
Richmond Real Estate Sales MTM and YTD Comparisons ‘07 & ‘08
So what’s hot and what’s not in the Richmond Real Estate Market? Actually, the pain is distributed fairly evenly. Most areas are experiencing sales decline in aggregate 34 % range for the composite area. The East End (Zones 42 and 40), old Mechanicsville (Zone 44), and the Southeast City (Zone 50) are experiencing some of the worst declines. Showing the most resilency are some surprisng areas like Central Henrico (Zone 32) and two of the “new suburbia” areas - Zone 54 in southwest Chesterfield and Zone 34 in northwest Henrico. The popularity for these areas can probably be attributable to the significant rehabiliation occuring in Zone 32 and the new construction available in Zone 54 and Zone 34. Here’s what the various Real Estate Zones reveal in a June ’08 versus June ’07 and Year to Date ‘08 versus Year to Date ‘07.
| Sales by Real Estate Zones for June 2008 vs 2007 | ||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | % Change | ||||
| Zone | # of sales | # of sales | ||||
| 10 | 56 | 75 | -25.33% | |||
| 20 | 30 | 53 | -43.40% | |||
| 22 | 104 | 161 | -35.40% | |||
| 24 | 20 | 35 | -42.86% | |||
| 30 | 32 | 43 | -25.58% | |||
| 32 | 33 | 52 | -36.54% | |||
| 34 | 94 | 137 | -31.39% | |||
| 36 | 44 | 67 | -34.33% | |||
| 40 | 19 | 53 | -64.15% | |||
| 42 | 22 | 57 | -61.40% | |||
| 44 | 45 | 94 | -52.13% | |||
| 50 | 16 | 33 | -51.52% | |||
| 52 | 82 | 123 | -33.33% | |||
| 54 | 118 | 133 | -11.28% | |||
| 60 | 41 | 57 | -28.07% | |||
| 62 | 124 | 169 | -26.63% | |||
| 64 | 37 | 61 | -39.34% | |||
| 66 | 22 | 38 | -42.11% | |||
| 939 | 1441 | -34.84% | ||||
| Sales by Real Estate Zones YTD 2008 vs 2007 | ||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | % Change | ||||
| Zone | # of sales | # of sales | ||||
| 10 | 259 | 400 | -35.25% | |||
| 20 | 138 | 219 | -36.99% | |||
| 22 | 412 | 650 | -36.62% | |||
| 24 | 98 | 145 | -32.41% | |||
| 30 | 136 | 208 | -34.62% | |||
| 32 | 176 | 230 | -23.48% | |||
| 34 | 411 | 575 | -28.52% | |||
| 36 | 186 | 282 | -34.04% | |||
| 40 | 139 | 251 | -44.62% | |||
| 42 | 143 | 293 | -51.19% | |||
| 44 | 220 | 369 | -40.38% | |||
| 50 | 109 | 201 | -45.77% | |||
| 52 | 396 | 606 | -34.65% | |||
| 54 | 545 | 760 | -28.29% | |||
| 60 | 218 | 317 | -31.23% | |||
| 62 | 499 | 736 | -32.20% | |||
| 64 | 178 | 263 | -32.32% | |||
| 66 | 131 | 194 | -32.47% | |||
| 4394 | 6699 | -34.41% | ||||